<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O&#8217;Malley featured in Playboy</title>
	<link>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/</link>
	<description>Baltimore, Maryland the daily conversation starts here.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 04:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>seriously...in what word is Jeb Bush "doable"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously&#8230;in what word is Jeb Bush &#8220;doable&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-2045</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 02:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-2045</guid>
		<description>Joe, I tend to think that if something falls within the taste boundaries of a traditional daily newspaper (such as The Sun), then it's certainly fair game for b. 

I also delight in the irony of Playboy engaging in some (mostly) male objectifying, for once. So I disagree that discussing the inclusion of our governor in a major national magazine is a sign of "Bad form, poor taste. No class, no style." 

The real question here, as Jordan says, is who put Jeb Bush on this list? That's the real outrage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, I tend to think that if something falls within the taste boundaries of a traditional daily newspaper (such as The Sun), then it&#8217;s certainly fair game for b. </p>
<p>I also delight in the irony of Playboy engaging in some (mostly) male objectifying, for once. So I disagree that discussing the inclusion of our governor in a major national magazine is a sign of &#8220;Bad form, poor taste. No class, no style.&#8221; </p>
<p>The real question here, as Jordan says, is who put Jeb Bush on this list? That&#8217;s the real outrage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YCKTR</title>
		<link>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator>YCKTR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-1982</guid>
		<description>It's a blog douchebag - not a physics symposium.  That said, I sort of agree with you.  They couldn't have chosen a less edgy and bland writing crew...for the most part.  I don't even pick-up the hard copy anymore.  I refuse to cringe at the horrendous design again.

!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a blog douchebag - not a physics symposium.  That said, I sort of agree with you.  They couldn&#8217;t have chosen a less edgy and bland writing crew&#8230;for the most part.  I don&#8217;t even pick-up the hard copy anymore.  I refuse to cringe at the horrendous design again.</p>
<p>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Mama</title>
		<link>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-1978</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-1978</guid>
		<description>Did bthesite.com really write this? Wow. I thought this site was geared toward the intelligent, tech-savvy 20's and early 30's generation. You guys sent the wrong info to beta-testers. Bad form, poor taste. No class, no style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did bthesite.com really write this? Wow. I thought this site was geared toward the intelligent, tech-savvy 20&#8217;s and early 30&#8217;s generation. You guys sent the wrong info to beta-testers. Bad form, poor taste. No class, no style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YCKTR</title>
		<link>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-1971</link>
		<dc:creator>YCKTR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-1971</guid>
		<description>I used to think he was pretty "doable."  He goes to my gym and trust me, I've seen the "total package."  However, I have trouble seeing him as anything more than a typical gub'ment douchebag these days.

Too bad - We would have been so good together Marty.  I guess we've just grown apart. Sigh.

!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to think he was pretty &#8220;doable.&#8221;  He goes to my gym and trust me, I&#8217;ve seen the &#8220;total package.&#8221;  However, I have trouble seeing him as anything more than a typical gub&#8217;ment douchebag these days.</p>
<p>Too bad - We would have been so good together Marty.  I guess we&#8217;ve just grown apart. Sigh.</p>
<p>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-1967</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-1967</guid>
		<description>I won't deny that Smilin' Martin is a cute dude, but if I ever have to see him in a cutoff t-shirt sportin' his biceps while playing irritating irish music outside of Ryleigh's again I will certainly heave. All over him. And his guitar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t deny that Smilin&#8217; Martin is a cute dude, but if I ever have to see him in a cutoff t-shirt sportin&#8217; his biceps while playing irritating irish music outside of Ryleigh&#8217;s again I will certainly heave. All over him. And his guitar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: #5? low!</title>
		<link>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-1965</link>
		<dc:creator>#5? low!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-1965</guid>
		<description>Helllo he should be #1. Arnold only got it b/c the call girls were from California</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helllo he should be #1. Arnold only got it b/c the call girls were from California</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachelisarockstar</title>
		<link>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-1960</link>
		<dc:creator>rachelisarockstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-1960</guid>
		<description>Have you ever seen Jennifer Granholm?  

This only leads me to believe those not chosen for this list must look like Medusa!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever seen Jennifer Granholm?  </p>
<p>This only leads me to believe those not chosen for this list must look like Medusa!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnny dollar</title>
		<link>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-1954</link>
		<dc:creator>johnny dollar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/05/omalley-featured-in-playboy/#comment-1954</guid>
		<description>i'm sure there are plenty of marylanders who would prefer to 'do' him now in a more 'hitman' sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m sure there are plenty of marylanders who would prefer to &#8216;do&#8217; him now in a more &#8216;hitman&#8217; sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
