Company takes back scholarships
by Lori Barrett | June 3, 2008 at 6:01 am
Posted in Baltimore, education
Four seniors at Patterson Park High were ready to receive $8,400 in scholarship money from Castle Toyota/Scion, so that they could attend Baltimore City Community College in the fall. They never got the money.
Castle Toyota/Scion invited news media to the graduation ceremony, in an attempt to get a little PR for their generosity. However, Patterson’s JROTC instructor passed away just days before graduation, so a decision was made by school officials to not allow any media at graduation — an attempt to maintain a more somber mood because many at the school were grieving. That’s when Castle took the scholarships away.
Castle’s president and CEO, Howard Castleman, said: “We opted not to give it to them because of, quite frankly, attitude.”
The school decided to raise funds to give students the tuition they were promised. Three-quarters of the money has been collected so far — some of it from staff members. Said the principal: “I let [the students] know that we were going to make it right.”
Castle Automotive also teams up with the Steve McNair Foundation to host a Christmas party for disadvantaged local children. To that end, Castleman said: “I’ll never, ever, ever give money again. This is it. I’ll never have another Christmas party for these kids. It doesn’t pay.”
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.



















June 3rd, 2008 at 12:30 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
So cut off the nose to spite the face? bad move Castle! because you could not use this supposed "kind gesture" as an advertising gimmick, you screw some kids out of a great chance at higher academia. Frigging hack opportunists.
June 3rd, 2008 at 12:54 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
This is terrible. Working with at-risk youth myself, I cannot imagine how these kids felt. What a terrible let down. I just saw on the news that a certain magazine is dropping 15 mil for Angelina Jolie and Brad pitts twins photo.. How is this really happening in a world where we must scrape by just to go to school????
Ugh.
June 3rd, 2008 at 12:55 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Castle Automotive also teams up with the Steve McNair Foundation to host a Christmas party for disadvantaged local children. To that end, Castleman said: “I’ll never, ever, ever give money again. This is it. I’ll never have another Christmas party for these kids. It doesn’t pay.”
Seriously?? I hope anyone that reads this thinks twice about buying a vehicle from Castle Automotive
June 3rd, 2008 at 1:24 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
My brain is having a difficult time accepting that this guy is for real. My heart tells me it is so, but this is a level of douche-baggery that I was sure could not possibly exist.
June 3rd, 2008 at 1:40 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
I umpire for disadvantaged children in Baltimore City in some of the most crime infested areas. Sometimes not enough kids show up and I just add brothers and sisters from the sideline to fill out a roster and play anyway as I get paid even if it's a forfeit. I could simply go home and spend time with my daughter, but I choose to stay to give these kids an opportunity to have fun.
These kids may never buy a car at Castleman Toyota/Scion and neither will I. And me and my wife can afford cars from his dealership. In fact, I need a new car. F*ck you Stve Castleman.
June 3rd, 2008 at 2:46 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
You know what, my initial reaction is to be upset with Castle Automotive, so I totally get why all of you are feeling the way you do. But here's something to think about: The school is to blame.
They should have NEVER told these kids that they were getting money until it was a done deal - meaning they had kept their side of the bargin..in this case allowing the graduation ceromony to focus on the generous donation made by Castleman. Castle Toyota is not UNICEF people, it's a business. If you don't make good on a business contract - it becomes void. Castleman is not the one that took these kids aside and said "hey I have some money for you", the school did that...and unfortunately, they were unable to hold up their end of the bargin to get that money.
Also find it annoying that the school felt like the graduation ceremony was too "sacred" to allow media attention, but not sacred enough to focus on the most important people, the students. they planned to treat the graduation as a sort of memorial for a staff person that had died. Guess what...it's not about a dead staff person, it's about the students. If the school had TRULY understood that...they would have followed through on their plans with Castleman.
Castleman was acting as a business person - and I promise you there is more to this story. Blame the school staff for confusing business with altruism. Also blame them for driving away someone that gave of himself during an annual event for disadvantaged children.
What a bunch of morons.
!
June 3rd, 2008 at 3:41 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Incorrect. He is still an opportunist. He is concerned about drumming business through exploitation. To blame the school is ridiculous. I am sure there are things we are not privy to, but the only ones that suffer as a result of this man's actions are the kids.
His statement regarding the Steve McNair foundation proves that it is about his wallet and not making a difference in the community.
June 3rd, 2008 at 3:51 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Castleman obviously has no class. Sure there was an agreement made with the school, but a man in the staff died and changes were made. So Castleman went from $32,000k of good publicity, to $32,000 of no publicity. Instead he chose $0.00 of insanely bad publicity.
He has no class and is an even worse business man. He'll lose that $32,000 easily in the bad publicity he has created for himself.
I guarentee another car dealership will step to the plate and take care of these 4 kids. Too bad Castle you lose, and I for one would never shop at your dealership.
June 3rd, 2008 at 3:54 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
He's a business person acting on behalf of a business - it was a business transaction. One that the school did not follow through with...so they lose the money.
You guys have business and goodwill confused. It's not his job to improve the community - however businesses usually provide resources to that end provided they get a return on their investment. If business people made it a practice of just giving out money to improve the community with getting a return, they wouldn't be in business very long.
He's not behaving any differently than any other business in the country. However, he is kind of moron for getting himself into a predictably touch situation. Perception is 9/10ths of the law - regardless of how the school behaved - and YES they ARE to blame - he will get some really awful PR and probably lose money.
It was a contract. The school, not Mr. Castleman reneged on that contract. They are entitled to nothing. And again, they should NEVER have promised those kids the money before it was a done deal.
And he's right on one point...giving to charity is not always the warm, hallmark experience you might expect. Go work at a soup kitchen some night and you'll know exactly what I'm talking about.
!
June 3rd, 2008 at 3:56 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
I guarentee another car dealership will step to the plate and take care of these 4 kids. Too bad Castle you lose, and I for one would never shop at your dealership.
----
yeah they'll do so because why? It's a good BUSINESS opportunity. But they will be PERCEIVED as heros...when the reality is...they just want a return on their investment just like Castleman.
!
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:00 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
YCKTR,
I agree it was a business transaction. I must say it has backfired was more for Castleman than it has for the school though.
That $32,000 he would have given to those students is pocket change compared to how much he is going to lose by the bad publicity he has created for himself and his comments such as this:
Castleman said: “I’ll never, ever, ever give money again. This is it. I’ll never have another Christmas party for these kids. It doesn’t pay.”
You'd be surprised but there are actually good businessmen in this country who give to causes and charities for more reasons than "it doesn't pay". Castleman obviously isn't one of them and he has shown he ain't too bright either.
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:06 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
I agree with you there - he should never have acknowledged the universal relationship between a business charity and the expectation of a return on that investment. That was a stupid-ass move.
!
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:26 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
I agree with YCKTR in that the school broke their business agreement. From a pure business standpoint, the school should have made arrangements with Castleman if they wanted to cancel their appearance at the ceremony. In the end, both sides end up looking very bad.
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:27 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Actually, the school promised to pay for the kids already. At least that is what it said in the Sun article. And I believe it was about 2K each for the 4 kids and not $8k.
But what I think galls me the most is this statement.... Castleman said: “I’ll never, ever, ever give money again. This is it. I’ll never have another Christmas party for these kids. It doesn’t pay.” He only wants to do it if he can get something out of it. He doesn't seem to realize that car dealers are thought of as sleazy to begin with. He just cements that image.
June 3rd, 2008 at 5:47 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
The school could have easily said, oh well, Castle isn't giving money anymore, too bad. But instead they are working to raise the money so the kids can still get scholarships. Yes they made some mistakes during the business arrangement with Castle, but they are making sure the kids don't get screwed. Castle on the other hand could give 2 rips about the kids.
June 3rd, 2008 at 6:17 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Ok, so every one of you that think Castle is to blame...I expect you to make a donation RIGHT NOW of $32,000. Ok...maybe less, but something that will make a real dent in your finances. That way you can demonstrate the behavior you find deplorable in Castleman. Anything less is hypocritical.
$32,000 is a HELL of a lot of money for a business owener...couple that with the prospect of not getting a return on the money AND getting treated like **** by the people you were giving the money to...well, I guarantee EVERY one of you would have said "screw it" too.
I mean what you guys are suggesting is that he should have just paid the money to avoid looking like a douchebag. Maybe so, but isn't that the same as initially paying the money so that he looks like a hero?
And all of you missed a very important detail. Quoted from the sun article:
"Instead of giving the $8,400 to Patterson, Castleman said, he will donate the money to the Community College of Baltimore County, for scholarships for students from city neighborhoods surrounding the dealership."
So you see Castleman is not refusing to put the money towards a good cause...he just doesn't want to give it to a business that welched on a contract.
The school screwed this up for those kids - and no amount of them raising the CONTRACTED funds will convince me otherwise. In true bleeding heart liberal fashion they expected to get something for nothing. The world doesn't work that way. Never did, never will.
!
June 3rd, 2008 at 6:44 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
It seems that Castleman was more concerned with having a banner placed at the graduation than anything else. Those who give from the heart don't need a blimp to broadcast the gift.
We all know that Castleman's gift was not from the heart and has never been from the heart because the kids who benefit from the Christmas party are being penalized. Patterson and the Christmas party have nothing to do with eah other.
Castleman is mad because he thought he could entice parents of graduating seniors at Patterson to stop by his car dealership and purchase their sons and daughters' cars for college--because Castleman gives back to the community.
June 3rd, 2008 at 6:52 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
The school is not a business. On the one hand he indicates that he gave it because he understands what it's like to struggle and then he turns around and says he is getting nothing out of it. Which is it? And to top it off he makes snide remarks about how the kids at Patterson will never be able to buy a car from him. From the way he's acted and the things he has said it is apparent that he is a self serving prick rather than a do gooder.
Perhaps he could have suggested another alternative such as advertising on the gymnasium wall or on the outfield wall at Patterson's baseball field. He had other alternatives. He just chose to take his ball and act churlish.
June 3rd, 2008 at 7:04 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Castleman is mad because he thought he could entice parents of graduating seniors at Patterson to stop by his car dealership and purchase their sons and daughters’ cars for college–because Castleman gives back to the community.
------
Yeah, and so what? That's the point of good business practice...to drum up more business. And if that means giving some money to the local community, hey even better.
What planet are you from? There is precious little "giving" going on in the real world that doesn't have some expectation of return or favor. And again, he's selling cars, not saving the whales. I bet that guy has GIVEN more to the community that you could imagine. Whether he expected something in return is irrelevant...if people benefit what's the real harm?
Also, you clearly aren't familiar with Patterson High School - otherwise you'd know that it's VERY unlikely that most of those kids are going to college, much less recieving the gift of a new car for graduation. The point, for him, was that there would be no media attention...media that would carry his advertisting message along with coverage of the event. Which is actually a crap shoot if you think about it...meaning the guy was taking a risk by spending all that money.
!
June 3rd, 2008 at 7:16 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Good business practice or not, there were still ways of doing this so that everybody won (by their personal definitions).
He could have presented the scholarships in a setting other than the graduation ceremony (hell, even immediately afterwards on the sidewalk out front), with all the banners and media he wanted, and the kids would not be scrambling in June for a way to pay for college.
Also, for the record, tuition at BCCC is $78 per credit hour, so as I understand it, Castleman was donating a total of $8,400 between the four kids.
June 3rd, 2008 at 7:19 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Perhaps he could have suggested another alternative such as advertising on the gymnasium wall or on the outfield wall at Patterson’s baseball field.
------------
Because then he would have been flushing money down the toilet.
!
June 3rd, 2008 at 7:27 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
He could have presented the scholarships in a setting other than the graduation ceremony (hell, even immediately afterwards on the sidewalk out front), with all the banners and media he wanted, and the kids would not be scrambling in June for a way to pay for college.
------
Totally see your point Lori - and I agree he probably could have handled it differently. But I don't think he handled it the wrong way. The school agreed to something and then backed out. The school reneged, not Castleman. Why should he give the money out on the sidewalk? That wasn;t the deal. And chances are he doesn't care about kids or whether they go to college...the important part was that he was willing to part with some money that could be used to help some kids go to college. The school should have seen that as PARAMOUNT. Instead, they refused to deliver...and they have no right to compain about it.
Now...here's something to think about. Where the hell are the students in all of this? The money would have affected their lives...not the lives of the staff. And the graduation ceremony is about them...not the staff. Why the hell couldn't they get it together enough to say, collectively, "we think this money is really important, so we'd like our graduation ceremony to be handled in a way that ensures delivery of that money."
The school should be ashamed for not only screwing up the deal, but also failing to produce assertive, self-actualized students.
!
June 3rd, 2008 at 7:33 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
YCKTR you say Castleman handled it the right way?
I have a feeling at the end of the month his accountant will say otherwise. I also would bet he has received a phone call or 2 from Toyota corporate headquaters today as well.
The fact that we find out this was $8000 total split between the 4 students make it even more laughable and not $32000.
I have a feeling Mr. Castleman is gonna wish he had given that $8000 scholarship out without making a fuss when this is all said and done.
June 3rd, 2008 at 7:39 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
No I think he was a moron for handling it the way he did. Trust me those Toyota execs will be concerned with his comments more than his inability to part with the money. He broke the code.
And yes, the school staff are just as much to blame. They knew they were dealing with a business and entering into a business contract. For them to back out and still expect the money is moronic and selfish at best.
!