Pearl Jam and offshore oil drilling
by Ben Pillow | June 24, 2008 at 7:00 am
Posted in celebrity, music, news, politics, the environment
So I took off from work Sunday to go to Pearl Jam’s show at the Verizon Center in Washington (and I have to say it was one of the better performances I’ve seen from the band out of five concerts now — just check out the set list) and going in, I wondered how many songs it would take Eddie Vedder to address the audience about something political.
For the record, he made it through a whopping 13 songs before prefacing “Green Disease” with some comments about President Bush’s proposal to lift federal bans on offshore oil drilling in the face of soaring gasoline prices. Eddie came close earlier in the show, urging the crowd before “Do the Evolution” to “pay attention” amid “some good things” and “some bad things” going on with the country, but the offshore drilling remarks were the overt anti-Bush administration comments that I fully expected to hear ahead of the show. I mean, this is a guy who wrote “Bushleaguer” in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks — you think he’s going to take the stage down the street from the White House and stick to singing? That’s never been the socially conscious band’s style.
Vedder railed against what he called the big-business mentality of the Bush administration, alleging that the president seeks to gobble up and reverse the fortunes of protected lands while he still can to open more acreage to drilling (and, by inference, grease the pockets of oil executives that back him). Continuing, Vedder left no doubt about his choice in November’s election, saying it would be nice to have some “color” in the White House.
Vedder’s nameless endorsement of Barack Obama aside, the remarks prompted me to review how the presumed Democratic presidential nominee and his likely rival, John McCain, responded to Bush’s call for increased drilling last week. Obama has pledged to keep in place the government’s 27-year moratorium on offshore drilling, arguing instead that he would invest $150 billion over the next 10 years to create “green” jobs and improve the electricity grid to accommodate plug-in hybrid vehicles, according to the Associated Press.
Obama criticized McCain’s position on the matter, essentially accusing the Arizona senator of flip-flopping. The Republican favored the moratorium during his 2000 campaign, but last week said he now supports lifting it to give states the option to drill, AP reported. On June 16, McCain said the move would “be very helpful in the short term resolving our energy crisis,” the crisis apparently being that gas costs $4 a gallon and the upward trend is expected to continue.
(An aside: Is it really a crisis? I mean, my brother was going to drive up from South Carolina to go to the show with me, but he later balked at shelling out the funds to keep his tank full for the trip. Yes, high gas prices are an inconvenience that we’re all learning to live with, and they might be keeping us closer to home, but an energy crisis in my mind is something that leads to much greater sacrifices — rolling blackouts and such. And as much as I missed seeing the show with my brother, I reminded him Pearl Jam was also playing in Columbia, S.C., during this tour.)
Anyway, Obama and his people point to findings of the Energy Information Administration, which has said opening access to undersea oil fields “in the Pacific, Atlantic and eastern Gulf regions would not have a significant impact on crude oil and natural gas production or prices before 2030.” Nothing “short term” about that. McCain’s entourage counters by calling Obama’s approach a “do-nothing, out-of-touch energy policy.”
With thoughts of an “Even Flow” guitar solo from Mike McCready so jamming long that Eddie has time to smoke a cigarette and ingest some wine before resuming his crooning still fresh in my head, all this political spin makes me want to retreat to music. This number from Sunday night’s D.C. show is a good start:
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.




















June 24th, 2008 at 12:26 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
This little side topic deserves a full-length paper, but, suffice it to say that you are conflating your energy sources. Electricity (at least in the US) predominantly comes from coal - which is a high-polluting but widely available domestic source. Oil is something entirely different. Transportation costs will skyrocket, and things like grocery prices will rise (they already have).
Yes, it's a crisis. Look up some references on the peak oil theory, and take a look at import/export trends for the past several decades. You tell us what you discover.
The general idea is that even an adequate influx of oil will not be available to accommodate the rising demand and prices. Take a look at USGS and DOE estimates of how much oil is available at ANWR - it's a spit in the wind. It won't bring our gasoline down to $0.73 / gallon. Hence, the logical course of action is to reduce our energy consumption on a massive scale and diversify our sources.
Unfortunately we can't just switch to electricity, because our power grid can't handle that kind of transport - that grid overhaul is overdue and underfunded and opposed by various factions in the government. Politicization of energy is real and it affects you, me and your brother.
June 24th, 2008 at 12:28 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Closin the Enron loophole would be a start at lowering prices. It's in the new farm bill that Bush vetoed and McCain voted against. Seems Mr. McCain's top strategists, including Phil Gramm (his economics advisor) have lobbied to keep it open in the past. Gramm's wife worked for Enron and now Gramm and his wife are on the board of UBS, which bought the remains of Enron. There is no oil shortage. Get us out of Iraq and close the loophole and gas will be back down to $2.00 per gallon almost overnight.
The last thing we need is that lying sack of **** John McCain as President.
June 24th, 2008 at 1:44 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Can you believe they didn't play Jeremy? Last Kiss was a nice surprise!
I tend not to listen when musicians or actors talk about politics and government.
June 24th, 2008 at 2:06 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Ursdogg doesn't pay attention when musicians or actors talk about politics and government only when they differ from his point of view.
June 24th, 2008 at 2:18 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Sunday was my first Pearl Jam show and I wasn't surprised to here Eddie Vedder slip politics in between songs. Isn't that why we like musicians, and people for that matter? For who they are, their opinions - regardless of whether they are the same as ours?
Yeah, the sound we love, but the lyrics from bands we love are their opinions - and some are political and religious.
Anyway, I like the barebones kind of presentation Pearl Jam has. STP is one of my favorite bands (I guess I can still call them a band since they are back on tour). But, a show by STP is totally different than Pearl Jam. STP is a performance to absorb. Pearl Jam's show absorbed the crowd. Pretty cool.
One of the highlights was Eddie bringing this kid on stage to play guitar with the band. That's enough to give that kid a reason to play for the rest of his life.
June 24th, 2008 at 2:54 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Alisia makes a good point: music doesn't form in vacuum. If you think that you can separate art from politics, you are forgetting John Ashcroft covering up statues, and P.M.R.C. telling you what you can listen to.
June 24th, 2008 at 3:03 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Isn't the saying "art reflects life, life reflects art?"
June 24th, 2008 at 4:17 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
alisia, you are so old school '90s and i didn't even know
June 24th, 2008 at 4:36 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Can Pearl Jam be considered old-school '90s when they are still playing and recording regularly?
=)