Curfew enforcement angers some parents
by Lori Barrett | July 13, 2008 at 12:22 pm
Posted in baltimore crime
Baltimore police are enforcing the city’s curfew this summer, but some parents aren’t liking it.
The citywide curfew for children under 17 has existed since 1978 (11 p.m. on weekdays and midnight on weekends). Before this year, however, it was nothing but a “de facto cab service,” according to the police commissioner. Now, thanks to a $120,000 federal grant, kids are rounded up and held at Nicholas Elementary School until their parents/guardians come to claim them.
While at the school, the children are photographed and fed, while workers check their names against a database of open warrants and probation records. The night the Sun reporter visited, 11 of 64 kids there were found in that database — many of whom remained at the center late into the night, unclaimed by their parents.
Said a DJS spokeswoman of the program: “It gives us the opportunity to have meaningful contact with [juvenile offenders]. We’re reaching them immediately and finding out why they are on the streets at night.”
Some parents of the other 53 kids — who likely may have been outside just to escape an un-air-conditioned home — weren’t as excited about that opportunity. Said a grandmother at the school: “I really consider this kidnapping. It’s like a dog pound coming through, scooping up children like that. They’re treating [my grandson] like a criminal when all he was doing was walking to a friend’s house to stay the night.”
Another mother appreciated the value of the effort — but just not in her case. Her 10-year-old son and his 8-year-old friend were picked up while playing catch outside of her home when she stepped inside to put her baby to bed. The mother said: “My child’s not a bad kid. He was probably scared to death.”
On the other hand, some parents expressed appreciation for the police’s efforts because they are unable to control the children themselves. The mother of a detained 14-year-old girl said: “When she doesn’t want to abide by my rules, she just doesn’t come home. I don’t know what to do. It just seems like if you’re not a drug addict and if you’re not beating the hell out of your kids, there’s no help for you.”
Should police be grabbing children from outside their homes? Yes, it’s technically a violation, but efforts could be better directed towards children just standing around on street corners or even in parks — although if I lived on a block with kids, my thoughts might be different. Are those of you with neighborhood kids playing catch in the street at 11:30 p.m. more appreciative of the city’s new babysitting service?
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.




















July 13th, 2008 at 3:18 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
I wish the police would stop by my neighborhood and round up a few children. I understand school's out and the kids are having fun, but at some point you'd expect parents to tell their children to come in the house and go to bed! It's not uncommon to see children, some as young as two or three-years-old outside late at night. Maybe the cops should haul off the parents too...
July 13th, 2008 at 10:52 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
Again...you can't unring a bell. The kids who need the most intervention are the ones with parents that probably don't care how late they stay out. Rounding them up isn't going to change that - like the article said...the parents don't even show up to claim them. The is same reason "baby booking" exists. And DJS involvement only guarantees that it will fail miserably. Those morons can't even keep their caseloads compliant with COMAR regulations...ie. the law. Their attempts are laughable at best.
That said, I think the curfew is a great idea...however, they shouldn't round up the kids and potentially traumatize the ones that actually have a shot at making it - cite the parents and hit them where it counts...in the pocket. 25 bucks for the first violation...and increase in increments of 10 for subsequent violations. Take that money and earmark it specifically for the school system. Come fall, Maybe then the kids will have history books that cover material past 1985.
!
July 22nd, 2008 at 2:06 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
The parents need to take responsibilty for their kids where-a-bouts not the city. I don't think as a taxpayer that my money should go for babysitting, they need to use that money to clean up all the damn trash in the streets. PARENTS BE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR OWN KIDS!!!!!
July 28th, 2008 at 12:31 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
It really concerns me the way they are handling the curfew law; first I am a good parent and my 15 year old son is a good child. He was scooped up today July 28, 2008 at 1:20am after the police saw him walking to the store w/my nephew who is 17 years old; he was a few steps away from returning to the house when they approached him. I think the curfew is great but if the 17 year old can be outside then my 15 year old should be okay being w/him if they are going to consider the 17 year old as being of age which doesn't make any since to me. I need some clarification on this. I'm not saying that the 17 year old should be responsible for my child but at least he's w/someone they consider responsible.
July 30th, 2008 at 5:53 pm | Please log in to reply. | Log in to rate this comment | report this comment
I think it's very sad that any city has been pushed to the point of a curfew. What does it say about the parents of the target children? If we can't stop and actually say what the problem is, then how will anyone or any city fix the problem? Is it not enough activities for the youth? Single family homes with mothers working at night? Drugs? Aids? no, I think the problem is FREE, If its Free, its worthless. All studies indicate that without some value or ownership in anything, you don't get a quality return. People sell food stamps to get money to buy drugs and booze. Children have babies so they quality for the housing that their single mother has, has had for the last 30 years. Its free, the government has to provide a place for me to live and food for me to eat and money for me to spend. If I work, I lose my FREE benefits. So, stop trying to sugar coat the Urban problem. There is a whole segment of Baltimore that is happy to live just where they are, getting just what they get. Everything for Free.