• Advertisement

    • video still
    • video still
    • video still
    • video still
    • video still
    • video still
  • Advertisement

Fixing the Baltimore school system in five easy steps, an ongoing series

by M.M. McDermott | October 27, 2008 at 11:04 am
Posted in baltimore politics, education

Teacher of the Year Thomas Acampora {Baltimore Sun photo}
Teacher of the Year Thomas Acampora {Baltimore Sun photo}

Step 3: Treat teachers like professionals.

In recent years, the public has gotten the equivalent of a backstage pass into Baltimore schools.  Mainstream media - thanks in large part to HBO’s “The Wire” and the documentary “Hard Times at Douglass High” - has provided the public with a raw and sadly accurate depiction of what insiders have known for a long time. Baltimore classrooms are hurting.

Then, there are the not-so-mainstream reminders.  Remember Ms. Berry?  Sure you do.  She was the art teacher from Reginald F. Lewis High School who had her clock thoroughly cleaned by a teenage girl while students stood around cheering her attacker on.  According to her administrators, Ms. Berry was at fault because she used “trigger words” to provoke the incident.  Naturally, the whole thing was recorded with a cell phone for the YouTube nation to gawk at and national news outlets to lead with.  A few seconds of shaky video were able to bring home to the public what pages of stale statistics couldn’t.

A large part of the problem lies with the devolving perception of teachers - particularly those in urban public school settings.  Gone is the time when teachers were treated as intellectuals, guardians of knowledge and custodians of thought.  Now, in too many schools, they’ve become glorified babysitters with college degrees.  If only.

What’s the going rate for a baby sitter?  Five bucks per kid per hour?  Multiply that by 30 kids and seven-hour work days and you’d be looking at teachers pushing $200K a year pre-tax.  Imagine all the BMWs in the faculty lot. If only.

It’s taken a perfect storm to cut the teaching profession down to size, with damaging winds of change coming from many directions.    There was a story my grandfather once told me about his dad, a former teacher at Poly.  The principal had come into his classroom during a lesson.  Apparently his presence was a major interruption.   So much so that my great-grandfather allegedly stopped the lesson, calmly placed his chalk on his desk, and bellowed at the administrator, “Get the hell out of my classroom! You’re distracting my students!”  The administrator left.  And nothing was ever said about it.

Extreme case, certainly.  But it underscores what’s happening now.  Teachers are impotent.  And the students know it.  Teachers can no longer send disruptive kids out of the classroom; they’ll be shuffled back in the following day.  Teachers can’t give failing kids the grades they actually earn; the minimum grade teachers can pencil in on a report card is a 55, even if the student showed up twice, set a trash can on fire and threw half the classroom textbooks out the window.  Teachers can’t even call for help; many schools don’t have working intercoms.

What’s worse, the weakening of teachers’ authority has come at a time when their responsibilities have grown.  They’re required to perform educational alchemy, getting kids who are performing at five and six years below grade level to pass standardized tests.  And they’re expected to be surrogate parents, providing everything from school supplies to lessons in morals.  Of course, most teachers have no problem filling in as foster parents.  It’s a part of the job that many embrace.  But being a parent without the powers of a parent makes the job practically impossible.

Then, there’s the aspect of training.  Professional development in the city is neither professional nor developmental.  In my experience, it’s consisted of educational wonks with countless degrees (yet no real teaching experience) visiting schools like traveling snake oil salesmen, selling the latest pedagogical cure.  They slap a brand spanking new name on an existing strategy and have a highly-paid consultant deliver a two-hour crash course in implementation.  Teachers are then directed to begin using this new/old strategy immediately.  Repeat the process four or five times a year, and you’ve got a pretty good idea of how it works.

Commensurate respect, real authority and meaningful training are linchpins of any profession.  The Baltimore City Public Schools System has traditionally failed to provide that to its teachers.  But it’s correctable.

Start by supporting teachers’ efforts.  Stand with them when they’re forced to make difficult decisions, like disciplining a child or, God forbid, defending themselves.  Trust teachers to determine what they need to build a successful classroom, and provide them with the administrative backing to make it happen.  If a kid is kicked out of class, don’t cycle them back in to repeat the behavior.  Find placement for them that will provide the best opportunity to learn, whether it’s a different learning track or a different school.

And finally, stop approaching professional development like we’re training teachers to operate a forklift.  Give them learning opportunities with substance.  Bring in teachers who’ve experienced success teaching in similar situations, not career educational policymakers.  Conduct intensive, full-scale classes for teachers during the summer months-and pay them while they learn.  And, if needed, have mentors accompany teachers in the classroom to help implement these strategies initially.  Show them that these approaches can work.

Most importantly, after all of these supports are provided, hold teachers accountable for results.  They’re professionals.  They must be expected to perform that way.

Previously:

Introduction to the series

Step 1: Leave magnet schools alone.

Step 2: Rediscover what worked before.


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

 

6 responses.

  1. It's true - the BCPSS has failed to evolve at the same pace that traditional values in the city have devolved.

    But let's be honest for a second - most of the teachers in the BCPSS are barely qualified to tie their own shoes. Besides specific feeder programs (Resident Teacher Program); who else would be attracted to such a dysfunctional setting?

    Sorry, I don't buy it...at least not entirely. I've worked with the kids that BCPSS refused to - and I've seen results. Rapists, drug dealers, violent offenders...all of them. Perhaps teachers are no longer regarded "intellectuals, guardians of knowledge and custodians of thought" because plenty of them don't behave as such. And no, I'm not pulling that out of the air; I've been in meetings with teachers with the vocabulary and behavior patterns of a common street person. It was hard to contain my laughter when they wondered out loud why they weren't getting through to Johnny. Umm perhaps because I personally have only understood about 10% of what you just mumbled as english? Maybe? Perhaps? Yeah.

    BUT...I do agree that Teachers don't get enough support in the schools...and that's not their fault. So at the end of the day, I do see your point...and agree that things would probably improve, or at least move in the right direction if there were more supports in place.

    !

  2. Ycktr's absolutely right...about some teachers. While I have a more optimistic estimation of the number of qualified teachers out there, there are certainly plenty in the system who are, at best, useless. They simply lack the skills--usually because they've graduated from some questionable teaching programs. I won't name names, but I'm sure folks can come up with a list of the usual suspects.

    Even in my Hopkins cohort, though, there was an English teacher who slept through half the classes, handed in atrociously written papers, and couldn't pass the content portion of their Praxis exams. It's a damn shame: even in our greatest institutions, there's a matriculation of mediocre talent.

    Endemic of our national love affair with liberal education policy and, in a broader sense, the "universal entitlement" of political correctness?

  3. Awww...come on...name some names. Let's really dig into this. Those programs are part of the problem right?

    At this point I'm thoroughly convinced that you have a pretty sharp perspective on the issue. I want more M.M. Don't let me down.

    !

  4. I'll play it this way: look at the colleges that have the state's lowest graduation rates and highest percentage of incoming students in remedial non-credit courses.

    If those colleges have a teaching program, you've got your answer.

  5. Filled with questionable, nostalgia tainted assumptions and beliefs, lacking in any empirical evidence, much less specific policy recommendations combined with muddled beliefs that one hand holds that in regards to teachers “there are certainly plenty in the system who are, at best, useless. They simply lack the skills” but on the other hand demands that the system “stand with them when they’re forced to make difficult decisions, like disciplining a child or, God forbid, defending themselves” and to “trust teachers to determine what they need to build a successful classroom, and provide them with the administrative backing to make it happen” earns this an F.

    Unsubstantiated personal stories, while amusing, make a poor basis on which to make policy.

    However, since you gain B reader comments, eyeballs, and increased ad money, not to mention you're the best they got, well that earns you an A for effort.

  6. With your grading system, IASW, I'm a solid C student. I can live with that for now.

    In advocating to give teachers autonomy, I'm referring specifically to the ones who should be in front of a classroom to begin with--the actual "professionals." My comments to ycktr are just as valid though. We're dealing in groups here, and I'd say that the majority of Baltimore teachers do a decent job; with the necessary supports, they'd fare much better. I simply acknowledged that, in a system with over 12,000 teachers and staff (according to the BCPSS website) there is, without a doubt, a sizable amount of deadwood.

    While you may disagree, I contend that if more policy was informed by personal experiences from the front lines rather than directives passed down by educrats, we'd have a much better school system than we do now.